Sample report

This is what your report looks like.

Real audit of Linear.app — 27 pages, 10 sections, 3 AI layers. Yours covers your product, your docs, your competitors.

Scroll to peek locked sections. Hover to see a one-line teaser.

Founder check: While you read this sample, a buyer is on your site deciding whether to stay or open a competitor tab.

See your score in 10 seconds →
What Aexo Noticed

Three examples of observations taken from real Fresh Eyes Reports.

Linear

Observation

The homepage highlights 'powered by AI agents' but there is zero documentation explaining what the agents actually do.

Why It Matters

A founder comparing Linear to Asana sees named AI Teammates with explicit permissions. Linear only shows a single Cursor demo and lacks proof.

Business Risk

Buyers evaluating enterprise-grade AI features will assume Linear's AI is just a wrapper, defaulting to competitors with clearer security and capability narratives.

Resend

Observation

The onboarding flow contains three friction points before the user experiences their first successful API call.

Why It Matters

Developers evaluate tools by how quickly they can get to a 'hello world' state. Any delay in this path breaks the core promise of developer-first simplicity.

Business Risk

High drop-off rate during initial evaluation. Developers will abandon the trial and fall back to established, albeit clunkier, legacy providers.

Cal.com

Observation

Self-hosting documentation assumes significant existing infrastructure knowledge from the reader.

Why It Matters

Enterprise buyers looking to self-host for data sovereignty reasons often delegate initial exploration to junior engineers who need clear, step-by-step guides.

Business Risk

Lost enterprise deals. If the initial technical evaluation fails due to poor documentation, the security and compliance conversation never even happens.

Interesting findings are easy.
The challenge is knowing which ones matter.

Product
linear.app
Subject of this report
Competitors
Notion, Asana
Comparative analysis
Report Sections
10
27 pages total
Review Layers
3
Research · Analysis · Expert review
Section 01

Executive Summary

Assessment

Linear is a well-positioned project management tool for engineering teams with a compelling differentiation strategy around speed, AI agents, and developer-first UX. However, the product suffers from critical messaging confusion, insufficient trust signals for enterprise buyers, and onboarding friction that undermines its core value prop of speed.

Honest Assessment

Linear has built something genuinely good, but the positioning is confused between Jira replacement and AI-first product development system. This ambiguity is leaving revenue on the table and confusing prospects in consideration.

Positioning
Confused
Trust Signals
Insufficient
Core UX
Differentiated

Sample Reports

Linear.app
Project Management
vs Notion · Asana

Issue tracking positioning audit — AI messaging confusion, missing trust signals, Jira comparison gaps

Download Free Sample →

No spam. One email if we find something interesting about your product.

15–20 page detailed audit
Resend.com
Developer Tools / Email API
vs SendGrid · Mailgun

Developer email API audit — onboarding friction, documentation gaps, trust signal analysis

Download Free Sample →

No spam. One email if we find something interesting about your product.

15–20 page detailed audit
Cal.com
Scheduling & Booking
vs Calendly · SavvyCal

Open source scheduling audit — positioning gaps, enterprise trust signals, self‑hosting documentation

Download Free Sample →

No spam. One email if we find something interesting about your product.

15–20 page detailed audit
PostHog.com
Product Analytics
vs Mixpanel · Amplitude

Product analytics audit — feature overload, setup complexity, integration clarity

Download Free Sample →

No spam. One email if we find something interesting about your product.

15–20 page detailed audit
Railway.app
Cloud Infrastructure
vs Vercel · Heroku

PaaS positioning audit — pricing predictability, enterprise security gaps, migration paths

Download Free Sample →

No spam. One email if we find something interesting about your product.

15–20 page detailed audit
Before you download

What you are actually getting.

The deliverable

Not a dashboard. Not a score. Not another analytics tool.

A founder-ready decision document. Structured around what a buyer understands, what confuses them, what makes them consider a competitor, and what is missing before they can say yes.

What you are paying for

You are not paying for a crawl.

You are paying for interpretation, prioritization, and independent judgment. Any AI can generate observations. Deciding which ones affect buyer decisions — and which are noise — is the hard part.

Why $299

One report. Six layers of review.

Website review
Documentation review
Competitor context
Buyer perception analysis
Trust signal review
Founder-level recommendations

Combined into a single decision document — not six separate reports.

Section 02

Executive Summary

Locked
Preview
Full section in your reportUnlock for your product — $299
Section 03

Revenue Leaks

Locked
Preview
Full section in your reportUnlock for your product — $299
Section 04

Where Competitors Win

Locked
Preview
Full section in your reportUnlock for your product — $299
Section 05

Buyer Confusion

Locked
Preview
Full section in your reportUnlock for your product — $299
Section 06

Trust Deficits

Locked
Preview
Full section in your reportUnlock for your product — $299
Section 07

First-Time User Friction

Locked
Preview
Full section in your reportUnlock for your product — $299
Section 08

Priority Fixes

Locked
Preview
Full section in your reportUnlock for your product — $299
Section 09

30-Day Action Plan

Locked
Preview
Full section in your reportUnlock for your product — $299

While you were reading this

A founder visited your site. You don't know if they stayed.

This sample took 27 pages to map Linear's gaps. Your product deserves the same outside-in read.